Wednesday, August 18, 2004

On Education

Unlike Tito Rolly who said he never dreamt of being a Teacher (but who is a successful one now), teaching used to be one of my dreams (though not really the one I really would like to be). But still, I really want to be part of any educational institution someday, either as a member, donor or active participant.

I've heard the government is studying to implement that kindergarten be made compulsory. This is instead of adding another year in High School. Before this, there was the Bridge Program.

While I commend the government for the effort in the improving the educational system, I still wish that some modifications be made for the effectiveness of teaching and for the real benefit of the children.

Elementary school students (especially in Public Schools) from Grade One to Grade Six are usually grouped into sections. On the next school year, it is either the student be promoted to higher section because of his good performance or to a lower section. My idea is that one whole school year is too long. What is happening is that it is either that the slow learner has to catch up with his classmates or the better student has to wait for his other classmates (depending on the way the teacher handles it).

Why not have the student undergo periodic evaluation (weekly or monthly the shorter the better) and then apply the promotion/demotion grouping on each period. I believe this is for the benefit of the children as the slow learner will really have to "learn" the lesson before going to the next or the better students can go as fast as he can. The school should then create a different set of learning goals for the "slow learner" and the "better students".

Another thing I would suggest is that besides giving scholarships to deserving students, the government should also give livelihood or employment opportunity to their parents or guardians especially those belonging to indigent families.


6 Comments:

Blogger Mec said...

I hope to be a teacher someday.

I'm actually a licensed (tho it's expired) elementary teacher... and can already teach in college because i have more than enough masteral units to back me up...

Anyway, I don't think an additional year is the answer. They've reported it already but somehow still seem to miss the fact that our kids today are being taught by incompetent teachers. Kids of today are smart and quick to note this.. but rather than standardize the competencies of teachers, or entice the good ones to stay with incentives, we just make do with who's willing or choiceless.

Worse, the books distributed in public schools, which should have been reviewed by DECS authorities, also promote the wrong information.

Adding another year of school just implies that there's something wrong with our kids... when there isn't. There are, however, a lot of wrong in their mentors.

1:29 AM  
Blogger rolly said...

This has been an issue we had been talking about in Sassy's blog a few months ago. The arguments are still not in favor of adding another year. First, because that is not the real solution. Adding another year would be a burden the poor will have to contend with. Simple as it may sound, but a stricter implementation of the passing rate is the answer. The problem is public schools are like diploma mills. Masabi lang na natuntong ng eskwelahan, edukado na.

Your solution of "promoting" to another section, probably in a higher plane is similar to an ii (idividualized instruction) scheme. Or, it may be having an honor's class. We do in my school but there has been a debate whether this works well or not. Some argue that it is synonymous to discrimination... that what the high average students are learning should also be taught to the low achievers, etc...

When I was in the elementary, our school, a catholic school, employed something similar, too. Row 1 is where the bright boys are and the poor ones are in row 4. Dun nakuha yung kasabihan na "pang row 4 ka lang naman e. Katabi ng basurahan." I used to wander sitting in different rows. Happy when I stay at row 1 and humiliated when transferred to row 4. May psychological implications din e...

5:28 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I want to be part of UP's teaching forces when I graduated. :)

1:03 AM  
Blogger santi said...

That's where really my concern is. That the low achievers are being taught lessons the same pace as those like the honor students. I don't think this can be considered as discrimination because this is for their own good. Imagine the child getting 5 out of 100 or even zero in Lesson I will now have to go to Lesson II. Just like in Math, a child who is not yet well verse with addition cannot be expected to perform well in lessons involving multiplication and division. It is better for them to finish half of the workbook having mastered each one of them rather than finishing the whole book without learning anything.

10:15 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is very interesting site... » »

3:37 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Enjoyed a lot! Microsoft dba certification Tab lock washer pcos changes of pregnancy clomid 50mg ciscount+viagra Refinance mortgages tazewell county va Provigil and ghi tadalafil tagamet domination movie sex Download antispam email filter Cheap clomid without prescription Toyota car seat cover car cheap insurance http://www.botox-tv-advertising.info/kuurschema_clomid.html bath tubs bubblemassage prescott sleeper sofa Lexmark printers troubleshooting

7:25 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home